Recently in Murder Category

June 9, 2011

40 Year Old Virgin Actor Gets Life For Attempted Murder

Assault with a deadly weapon and attempted premeditated murder of an ex-girlfriend could be considered the antithesis of what one associates with a hilarious blockbuster comedy. An actor who appeared in "The 40 Year Old Virgin," however, has reportedly been charged and convicted of these violent crimes and been sentenced to life in prison with the possibility of parole in twelve years. There is nothing funny about that. While Shelley Malil's defense attorney described his ex as a violent drama queen, it was the defendant that stabbed her multiple times with a kitchen knife in a jealous rage upon finding her sharing a drink with a male friend in her own home.

A jury has convicted the actor and sentenced him to life in prison for attempted premeditated murder and assault with a deadly weapon. The assault was of course that he stabbed her repeatedly with a kitchen knife. The premeditated murder charge may be analagous to an attempted murder charge in New Jersey. The issue for the jury was to decide if the Defendant had the intent to kill the victim when he began stabbing her. In this instance, they found that he intended to kill her when he began to stab her and he was convicted of that crime. He was also charged with burglary but acquitted on that lesser charge. He can be charged with burglary because he meets the elements of the crime: he entered her home as an uninvited guest and committed a crime in the dwelling. However, it also had to be shown that he had the intent to commit that crime when entered her home. In this situation, the defendant showed that he did not have the intent to assault and murder her. This would be because he did not know the victim was with another man until after he entered the dwelling. He actually only went to her house uninvited to tell her that he had taken her pot and sent some explicit sex photos of the two of them to her co-workers. There is nothing funny about that either.

The mild upside for the Defendant is that he eventually can be eligible for parole and thus most likely will not be confined to prison for the rest of his life. While domestic violence is common, it is not likely that the average person would have this nuanced legal knowledge or even if they did, be capable of drawing upon it in the midst of a conflict. If an individual describe themselves as having a emotionally volatile temperament and intense relationships, or as being involved with this type of personality, he or she would be well served by identifying an experienced attorney to call immediately should he or she be involved in any domestic altercation in order to best protect his or her legal rights.

April 1, 2011

Real Life Law & Order: Murder Conviction of a NY Jeweler and No Body Found

In a case that will likely appear on a Law and Order episode, a jeweler, whose clients have included Donald Trump and Yoko Ono, has reportedly been sentenced to 25 years in prison for killing his wife, despite the fact that her remains have not been conclusively identified. During his trial, it was determined that he knocked his wife unconscious with a piece of wood and incinerated her body in an oil drum. The theory that he used his scientific knowledge of acids to destroy forensic evidence such as bones and teeth that could be used to identify her has been accepted by the Court. It should be noted that she was in the process of divorcing him, and he stood to lose more than $1.5 million.

The Defendant, representing himself, made the argument that his confessions were inadmissible, but the Court doesn't accept it. For a confession to be considered by the Court to have been involuntary, the defense must show that the police overbore the defendant's will and he was forced to confess. In this case, that doesn't seem to have been shown. First, the Defendant claimed he confessed due to pressure from a friend, even though he didn't seem to indicate how that pressure occurred. He told the friend that his wife "doesn't exist anymore" and that "they can't find her" while that friend was wearing a wire. There appears to be little other evidence offered by Defendant to show how law enforcement did anything improper so as to coerce a confession.

The prosecution leveraged testimony from five witnesses, including the victim and defendant's teenage son, the victim's cousin and sister. His accusations that the judge is prejudiced and the prosecutor incompetent, and that his wife's family and friends formed a lynch mob, did little to strengthen his legal strategy. His statement that "it is impossible to burn a human body and leave no evidence" seems to highlight his terrible and horrific accomplishment. What ever an expert, experienced criminal defense attorney may have done for him in Court will never be known. What is known, however, is that an attorney would have been a better choice.

March 8, 2011

The Difference Between Felony Murder and Manslaughter, as Demonstrated by a Long Branch Man

So it would seem that Qumere McClendon, 24, of Long Branch got lucky on his acquittal of murder. Sadly for him, he was convicted on the counts of manslaughter and felony murder, in addition to numerous others to do with the case. This is a tough case for any attorney.

Any kind of murder is a felony. However, this is a specific name for a certain circumstance of murder. Felony murder states that if a murder occurs during the commission of another felony, say robbery, perhaps, then the party who committed the robbery is also responsible for the murder. This also applies to other crimes such as rape, arson, and kidnapping. Now here's where it gets interesting: if there are multiple people involved in the initial felony, each one of them is responsible for the subsequent murder... even if they did not have a hand in killing the victim!

For example, if two people rob a bank, and a bank teller is murdered in the process, the one who drove the car is just as indictable, for that murder as the one who actually shot the teller. The driver is as serious a criminal, in the eyes of the law, as the person who fired a gun or wielded a weapon in the robbery. Additionally, the penalties for a felony murder conviction are just as severe as those for actual murder in the state of New Jersey.

Murder and manslaughter are two different things. Murder, as it is defined, denotes certain malice involved with carrying out the act. While manslaughter is by no means an "innocent" act, the intent behind it is perceived to be one less malicious, less cold, and less absolute than that of murder. One could say that with murder, "he knew exactly what he was doing", and with manslaughter, "maybe he didn't know exactly, but had a pretty good idea." These legal distinctions, as you can see, can have a huge impact on the sentence imposed upon the Defendant. Further, a Defendant might not realize how serious some of his or her actions relating to another's crime can be in a legal sense. What is clear: The services of a criminal defense attorney are crucial in order to protect your rights if charged with a crime.

January 10, 2011

Killer Ice Cream Truck Driver Plead Guilty to DUI and More...

A Monmouth County man will reportedly be sentenced in Freehold to five years in prison in connection with the death of Wall Township man. Walter Poland was intoxicated when he hit the victim with his truck. Mr. Poland pleaded guilty to driving with a suspended license, driving while intoxicated and leaving the scene of a fatal accident. His 54 year-old victim used a walker, had fallen and was lying on the ground in the shoulder on Route 35 in Wall Township. Police found Mr. Poland with help from a witness who reported the incident, which occurred back on October 4, 2010. These are three separate offenses, 1. driving with a suspended license, 2. driving while intoxicated, 3. leaving the scene of a fatal accident, but all deal with his fatally irresponsible operation of an ice cream truck.

A DWI offense means he admitted to being intoxicated while operating a motor vehicle, Driving While Intoxicated. The suspended license offense means his license was suspended at some point prior to this accident for a motor vehicle violation, and that he has no legal right to be on New Jersey's roads. If that previous offense was a DUI conviction, Driving Under the Influence, then the current convictions carry mandatory jail time. In this case, the number of offenses charged is a factor that will be considered in his sentence.

Finally, the leaving the scene of a fatal accident is an extremely serious offense. In any motor vehicle accident, whether a fender bump or a full on crash, if someone involved in the accident leaves the scene of that accident, that person can lose his or her license. If injuries occur, the penalty becomes more significant. Obviously, in this case where there was a fatality, leaving the scene is a regarded as a fairly shocking wrongdoing. The public is supposed to be protected from anyone driving who has not earned the privilege of a valid drivers license from the state. So we can be certain that Mr. Poland will be off New Jersey roads for a long time.

Even one conviction of DUI on your record could have a big negative impact on your future. It is vital that an attorney assist in handling any DUI or motor vehicle charges. Contact an experienced attorney immediately if you have any DUI or motor vehicle charges brought against you.

July 29, 2010

Woman (Wielding Urine) Scorned, Served Assault With Her Attempted Murder Charge

Hell hath no fury like a woman wielding a urostomy bag scorned... Reportedly, an ex-girlfriend was lurking outside the home of her ex-boyfriend, when she was detected and confronted. She immediately attempted to hit her ex's brother with her automobile and then drove away. When police pulled her over soon afterwards, she detached her urostomy bag and hurled it at the three officers, splashing them with urine.

Not only can this woman be charged with attempted murder for trying to hit a man with her vehicle, but she also can get in trouble for assault on police officers. Though her attempt did not connect directly, under criminal law, the throwing of a bag of urine would constitute assault if it hit an officer. Here, the liquid did make contact sufficient to uphold a simple assault charge. This is analogous to one individual spitting on another. Even though he or she didn't actually reach out and touch someone in a layman's understanding, the spit itself acts as an extension of the person and thus criminal exposure results. The same is true here, as urine acts as an extension of the woman by hitting the police with it. Naturally, her more urgently serious problem is the attempted murder charge, but still interesting regarding throwing a bag of urine. Either charge should be handled by an experienced attorney.

May 5, 2010

Privileged Student-Athlete Relationship Leads to Tragic Murder

The police are still investigating the situation even though they know that George Huguely killed Yeardley Love. However, the police are doing their due diligence to make sure they prove their case. Also, the police are searching for information about the lacrosse player's state of mind. If they can find some evidence of proof that he intended to kill Ms. Yeardley, also a lacrosse player, then he can be charged with first-degree murder. This is a much different ranking than the rest of his team, ranked first in collegiate lacrosse right now. If that evidence cannot be produced then Mr. Huguely can argue that the crime was manslaughter. That means the death was an accident or that he didn't intend to kill her, but only intended to harm her. Practically speaking this could mean the difference of the young man spending life in prison with no chance of parole or merely spending a very long time in prison.

It is beginning to look like there is evidence of his state of mind because it has been reported that he allegedly attacked Ms. Yeardley before, at another university, the University of North Carolina. They had a long term, on-off-again volatile relationship. Our "gentleman" student-athlete has been arrested for threatening to kill a female police officer while drunk, in an altercation where the officer eventually tasered him. He apparently jumped off the family yacht when his father called the police to come out a quarter mile off shore from the family's Florida estate to help with a domestic dispute. Both the defendant and the victim were raised in a life of privilege, complete with prestigious prep schools the likes of which make this story ripe for a made-for-television-movie. In the interim, the trial will unfold that will demonstrate the relevant issues in prosecuting and defending crimes of passion. There are many lesser crimes resulting from domestic type disputes that, if prosecuted, could prevent the violence from escalating. A proper, skilled defense by an experienced attorney can redirect someone a defendant on a destructive path toward a more productive, mentally healthy life and protect those around him or her.

February 5, 2010

DUI Defendant's Facebook Picture Causes Judge to Stiffen Sentence

A 17 year-old girl pleaded guilty to misdemeanor driving while intoxicated and criminally negligent homicide connected to a car crash that killed her boyfriend. She was driving drunk in the middle of the night, and crashed her car into a brick pole. She had a blood alcohol level of .13 % and was driving 56 m.p.h. in a 30 m.p.h. zone. Basically, she got behind the wheel of a car while drunk, and should have known that doing so could easily kill someone. Every state, including New Jersey, has its own requirements, definitions and terms for driving while under the influence of drugs or alcohol and the crimes that stem from that action. As always, it is crucial to consult an attorney well versed in those laws.

The Judge denied her youthful offender status and imposed a 6-month jail sentence reportedly because he had seen a picture she posted of herself on Facebook. The photograph was taken of her one month after the crash, and she posted it captioned "drunk in Florida." She could have gotten as much as 4 years in state prison, but the Judge reportedly felt forced to consider her young age and clear history.

Her drivers license is revoked, and following her jail sentence, she will be under electronic home monitoring for one year and on probation for five, during which she is not allowed to drink under its terms.

A judge wants to see a remorseful defendant regardless of the crimes he or she has been charged with or found guilty of, and evidence to the contrary is extremely damaging. The Judge is free to consider all factors that have any arguable relevance. Every defendant should keep in mind that the Judge wants to see that his or her encounter with the criminal justice system has taught a lesson and changed his or her behavior for the better. The Internet has created a new environment in which to evaluate a defendant's behavior, and it is completely public. There is a new way we are all being held accountable for our behavior, and the legal profession is aware, that is nothing new. The consequences can clearly be harsh, and it is yet another lesson young adults have to learn.

August 21, 2009

Reality TV Finalist Ryan Jenkins wanted for Wife's Brutal Murder

An update from a previous entry, Los Angeles Police have now charged Ryan Jenkins with the murder of his wife, Jasmine Fiore. Apparently, police were able to gather enough evidence to show that Mr. Jenkins was responsible.

Also, it appears doubtful that Jenkins retained a lawyer as he has escaped to Canada. If he is appreheneded in Canada, he can only be extradited to the United States if he would not face the death penalty.

New Jersey Criminal Lawyer Blog's Take: This is a sad turn, but it appears Jenkins has decided to take his chances on the run. This will be an interesting situation to see if Jenkins is caught in Canada or if he is seeking to escape to another country which will not extradite him to the U.S.

There is no legal strategy discussion left in this matter, it really just comes down to when and where the authorities capture Jenkins.

Megan Wants a Millionaire Star wanted for Murder - Times Online 8/21/09

August 19, 2009

Swimsuit Model Murdered, Ex-Reality Contestant a "person of interest"

Jasmine Fiore, 28, a former swimsuit model beauty, was found dead on Saturday, August 15, 2009 in Los Angeles. Her body was found strangled left in a suitcase in Buena Park, CA. Later that day, her husband Ryan Alexander Jenkins, 32, reported her missing and subsequently, Mr. Jenkins has gone missing as well. Jenkins was a former contestant on VH1's dating reality show "Megan wants a Millionaire."

Police said that Fiore was last seen alive on Friday night at her Los Angeles home. She and Jenkins were planning on attending a poker party in San Diego that evening. Police have stated that Jenkins is a "person of interest" in the investigation. Moreover, Police believe the Canadian citizen may be headed north to Canada in Fiore's 2007 Mercedes CL S550. Border authorities have been notified.

New Jersey Criminal Lawyer Blog's Take: When someone is called a "person of interest," it means the Police want to talk with this person and obtain a formal statement. Depending on the results of the statement, a person such as Jenkins in this case could be charged with the crime. The reason he is not a suspect at this time is probably because police are still investigating the crime.

There is a report from TMZ.com that says Jenkins publicist said that "Ryan is currently speaking to his attorney and will fully cooperate with the police in this matter. He is planning on meeting with them in the near future." This would be the logically step if Ryan has sought legal representation. However, the fact that he cannot be located does make one wonder if something else is going on in this matter.

It can be common for people to assume that someone is "hiding" something if one seeks an attorney at this stage. Actually, hiring legal counsel is the prudent move. The attorney should let the police department know that the person has hired legal counsel. Therefore, any communication between the "person of interest" and the police will be handled through the attorney's law office. The attorney will then let the police gather their facts and then determine whether his client is going to give a formal statement. If the client rushed to give a formal statement it could allow the police to confuse the person and get answers the police want rather than objectively conducting an investigation.

In this instance, the issue is the fact that Jenkins has disappeared altogether. Besides, the poor impression it makes it could create a bigger problem when he is eventually caught. If the TMZ.com report is accurate and he has retained a lawyer, the first thing his attorney should advise him is that he should return to the area. Although, they may hold off on a formal statement at this time; nonetheless, the police know where Jenkins is located when the time comes to question him about Fiore's death.

Reality Show finalist sought in Swimsuit model's murder - Fox News 8/19/09

VH1 Reality Show Contestant sought - ABC News 8/19/09