Was It Cocaine or Baby Powder? Oregano or Marijuana?
Drug tests results carry a lot of weight in a courtroom. They are a requirement of any prosecution of a drug related crime. A scientist at NYPD forensic lab tech has been accused of falsifying drug test results and suspended when a trial was stopped due to concerns about her testimony. Mariem Megalla is reported to have mislabeled samples as positive, and failing to retest negative samples and marking them positive to save herself the work. The media has reported the details of her mishandling, misdeads and omissions. With 180 open felony cases from this year alone, this could rock the criminal justice system for the near future, possibly triggering appeals where possible. The Quality Control staff of the NYPD uncovered her alleged botched tests. This is not the first time that the forensic labs have been accused of sloppiness, laziness or incompetence, the most recent of which was in 2006.
This is a very serious matter because it puts the reliable of the state's evidence at stake. In a case involving drugs, the police cannot claim a substance is, for example, cocaine, without having it tested. Here is a hypothetical example: A car is stopped and police located packs of white powder, which they believe to be cocaine in the backseat of the car. The suspect can be arrested and charged with possession of cocaine; however, the state must prove that substance in cocaine at the time of trial in order to obtain a conviction. In this matter, it appears a lazy lab tech has put the state in a bind. If the substance was not properly tested defense counsel will move to have the evidence suppressed and then State will have no case to prove. This may turn out to only be an isolated incident, but every New York attorney that had a case where Ms. Megalla was the lab tech will surely be seeking that the State verify the results. Of course, a good attorney defending drug charges will examine the veracity of forensic evidence.